📅
Book a session — Calendly
 

Overview

Neither a fluid to be measured nor a mystical belief: Qi is a functional model, describing how the body regulates itself. The translation as energy is the main source of misunderstanding, on both sides of the debate.

Where this idea comes from

It comes from the translation. When Jesuit missionaries rendered qi as energy, they gave a functional concept the appearance of a physical substance. Since then, everyone has been looking for that substance, and not finding it, concluded that the concept was mystical.
It also comes from the marketing of the wellness industry, which uses the word to sell crystals, magnets and devices. The gap between that vocabulary and the Chinese clinical use of qi is total, but the public only sees the vocabulary.
A third source is legitimate: the demand for measurable quantities. If nothing can be dosed, counted or imaged, a scientific mind suspects an empty word. The answer is not to deny the concept, but to explain what kind of concept it is.
Finally, the word carries a political charge. In China, the concept was criticised during the twentieth century as an obstacle to modernisation, then rehabilitated as a cultural heritage. Imported to Europe, it arrived already loaded with that quarrel.

What Chinese medicine says

In everyday Chinese, qi is not a mystical term at all: it appears in words for weather, mood and vitality, much as the word spirit circulates in French without any religious claim. "Sheng qi" means to get angry; it does not mean that a gas has escaped.
In the medical corpus, qi describes functions: what moves, what transforms, what protects, what holds in place. To say that qi stagnates is to say that a function is blocked, not that a fluid has stopped. The clinical reasoning that follows is about functions, not substances.
The same word also describes the weather, the seasons and the relation between the body and its environment. Treating a patient with a seasonal pattern is not mysticism: it is observing that symptoms change with heat, cold, humidity or lack of sleep.

What the research says

No study has isolated Qi, and none will, because the concept is not defined as a measurable entity. The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health describes it as a vital energy or life force concept, and notes that the mechanisms proposed for acupuncture are described in nervous, vascular and connective tissue terms.
What research does show is that needling produces measurable effects: local microtrauma, release of adenosine and endorphins, modulation of the autonomic nervous system. These mechanisms do not require Qi to exist as a substance, any more than the concept of stress requires a stress molecule.
What is established: Qi is a model, not a substance. What is debated: whether that model adds anything to a physiological description. What is unknown: how to translate it without either mystifying it or flattening it.

What to expect in practice

In practice, this changes little for the patient, and a lot for the conversation. A practitioner who says "your qi is blocked" without explaining what they mean is hiding behind vocabulary. A practitioner who says "your digestion and sleep are irregular, and that pattern guides my points" is doing the same work, transparently.
At the Centre Équilibre in Grenoble, Ghislaine Morin translates the vocabulary into plain French, without either the mystical patina or the embarrassed denial. The TCM dispensary she organises there is a good setting to ask what the words mean before any treatment.

When to consult, and when not to

Consult if the vocabulary does not need to be taken literally for you to judge the result. You are entitled to ask for a translation of every term, and to refuse to accept one that is never explained.
Do not consult a practitioner who explains a serious symptom by a blocked qi without referring you to a doctor. A functional model never authorises ignoring a lesion, an infection or a tumour.

Frequently asked questions

Is qi a real thing?
It is a real concept, with a clinical use, but not an object that can be isolated in a laboratory. Asking whether it exists is like asking whether the concept of stress exists: it describes a set of phenomena, and it is useful as long as it guides action.
Why do practitioners talk about energy?
Because it is the usual translation of qi, and because it appeals to patients. The word is convenient and misleading: it suggests a fuel to be refilled. In practice, it usually means vitality, digestion, sleep and mood, taken together rather than separately.
Can I believe in TCM without believing in qi?
Yes. You can treat the model as a clinical map and judge the results empirically. Many patients do exactly that, and many practitioners accept it. What matters is that both sides are clear about what is claimed and what is measured.

Frequently asked questions

Useful links

Sources

"TCM only works for stress" : the real indications, without exaggeration"TCM is banned in France" : what the law actually says
Loading...